Superhydrophobic paper in the development of disposable labware and lab-on-paper devices.
Traditionally in superhydrophobic surfaces history, the focus has frequently settled on the use of complex processing methodologies using nonbiodegradable and costly materials. In light of recent events on lab-on-paper emergence, there are now some efforts for the production of superhydrophobic paper but still with little development and confined to the fabrication of flat devices.
This work gives a new look at the range of possible applications of bioinspired superhydrophobic paper-based substrates, obtained using a straightforward surface modification with poly(hydroxybutyrate). As an end-of-proof of the possibility to create lab-on-chip portable devices, the patterning of superhydrophobic paper with different wettable shapes is shown with low-cost approaches.
Furthermore, we suggest the use of superhydrophobic paper as an extremely low-cost material to design essential nonplanar lab apparatus, including reservoirs for liquid storage and manipulation, funnels, tips for pipettes, or accordion-shaped substrates for liquid transport or mixing. Such devices take the advantage of the self-cleaning and extremely water resistance properties of the surfaces as well as the actions that may be done with paper such as cut, glue, write, fold, warp, or burn.
The obtained substrates showed lower propensity to adsorb proteins than the original paper, kept superhydrophobic character upon ethylene oxide sterilization and are disposable, suggesting that the developing devices https://biodas.org/ could be especially adequate for use in contact with biological and hazardous materials.
Contaminating levels of zinc found in commonly-used labware and buffers affect glycine receptor currents.
Zinc is an allosteric modulator of glycine receptor function, enhancing the effects of glycine at nM to low μM concentrations, and inhibiting its effects at higher concentrations. Because of zinc’s high potency at the glycine receptor, there exists a possibility that effects attributed solely to exogenously-applied glycine in fact contain an undetected contribution of zinc acting as an allosteric modulator.
We found that glycine solutions made up in standard buffers and using deionized distilled water produced effects that could be decreased by the zinc chelator tricine. This phenomenon was observed in three different vials tested and persisted even if vials were extensively washed, suggesting the zinc was probably present in the buffer constituents. In addition, polystyrene, but not glass, pipets bore a contaminant that enhanced glycine receptor function and that could also be antagonized by tricine.
Our findings suggest that without checking for this effect using a chelator such as tricine, one cannot assume that responses elicited by glycine applied alone are not necessarily also partially due to some level of allosteric modulation by zinc.
Labware additives identified to be selective monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors
Plastic labware is used in all processes of modern pharmaceutical research, including compound storage and biological assays. The use of these plastics has created vast increases in productivity and cost savings as experiments moved from glass test tubes and capillary pipettes to plastic microplates and multichannel liquid handlers. One consequence of the use of plastic labware, however, is the potential release of contaminants and their resultant effects on biological assays.
We report herein the identification of biologically active substances released from a commonly used plastic microplate. The active contaminants were identified by gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy as dodecan-1-ol, dodecyl 3-(3-dodecoxy-3-oxopropyl)sulfanylpropanoate, and dodecanoic acid, and they were found to be selective monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors.
3D Printing in the Laboratory: Maximize Time and Funds with Customized and Open-Source Labware
- 3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, is the computer-guided process of fabricating physical objects by depositing successive layers of material. It has transformed manufacturing across virtually every industry, bringing about incredible advances in research and medicine. The rapidly growing consumer market now includes convenient and affordable “desktop” 3D printers.
- These are being used in the laboratory to create custom 3D-printed equipment, and a growing community of designers are contributing open-source, cost-effective innovations that can be used by both professionals and enthusiasts. User stories from investigators at the National Institutes of Health and the biomedical research community demonstrate the power of 3D printing to save valuable time and funding.
- While adoption of 3D printing has been slow in the biosciences to date, the potential is vast. The market predicts that within several years, 3D printers could be commonplace within the home; with so many practical uses for 3D printing, we anticipate that the technology will also play an increasingly important role in the laboratory.
3D-Printed Labware for High-Throughput Immobilization of Enzymes
In continuous flow biocatalysis, chemical transformations can occur under milder, greener, more scalable, and safer conditions than conventional organic synthesis. However, the method typically involves extensive screening to optimize each enzyme’s immobilization on its solid support material. The task of weighing solids for large numbers of experiments poses a bottleneck for screening enzyme immobilization conditions. For example, screening conditions often require multiple replicates exploring different support chemistries, buffer compositions, and temperatures.
Thus, we report 3D-printed labware designed to measure and handle solids in multichannel format and expedite screening of enzyme immobilization conditions. To demonstrate the generality of these advances, alkaline phosphatase, glucose dehydrogenase, and laccase were screened for immobilization efficiency on seven resins. The results illustrate the requirements for optimization of each enzyme’s loading and resin choice for optimal catalytic performance. Here, 3D-printed labware can decrease the requirements for an experimentalist’s time by >95%. The approach to rapid optimization of enzyme immobilization is applicable to any enzyme and many solid support resins. Furthermore, the reported devices deliver precise and accurate aliquots of essentially any granular solid material.
Additive manufactured customizable labware for biotechnological purposes
- Yet already developed in the 1980s, the rise of 3D printing technology did not start until the beginning of this millennium as important patents expired, which opened the technology to a whole new group of potential users. One of the first who used this manufacturing tool in biotechnology was Lücking et al. in 2012, demonstrating potential uses 1, 2. This study shows applications of custom-built 3D-printed parts for biotechnological experiments.
- It gives an overview about the objects’ computer-aided design (CAD) followed by its manufacturing process and basic studies on the used printing material in terms of biocompatibility and manageability. Using the stereolithographic (SLA) 3D-printing technology, a customizable shake flask lid was developed, which was successfully used to perform a bacterial fed-batch shake flask cultivation. The lid provides Luer connectors and tube adapters, allowing both sampling and feeding without interrupting the process. In addition, the digital blueprint the lid is based on, is designed for a modular use and can be modified to fit specific needs.
- All connectors can be changed and substituted in this CAD software-based file. Hence, the lid can be used for other applications, as well. The used printing material was tested for biocompatibility and showed no toxic effects neither on mammalian, nor on bacteria cells. Furthermore an SDS-PAGE-comb was drawn and printed and its usability evaluated to demonstrate the usefulness of 3D printing for everyday labware. The used manufacturing technique for the comb (multi jet printing, MJP) generates highly smooth surfaces, allowing this application.
Micro Labware Kit |
|||
| LA025-1NO | EWC Diagnostics | 1 unit | 16.29 EUR |
Micro Labware Kit |
|||
| LA025-5NO | EWC Diagnostics | 1 unit | 72.8 EUR |
Purite Labwater 1 Deioniser Cartridge - EACH |
|||
| WAT3314 | Scientific Laboratory Supplies | EACH | 176.85 EUR |
Purite Labwater 2 Deioniser Cartridge - EACH |
|||
| WAT3316 | Scientific Laboratory Supplies | EACH | 264.6 EUR |
Purite Labwater 1 Water Deioniser with Coil and Gun - EACH |
|||
| WAT3002 | Scientific Laboratory Supplies | EACH | 831.6 EUR |
Purite Labwater 2 Water Deioniser with Coil and Gun - EACH |
|||
| WAT3006 | Scientific Laboratory Supplies | EACH | 1026 EUR |
LabWipes, Small (4.5"x8.3"), 280/box |
|||
| S.26415 | IHC World | - | 4.8 EUR |
Grant Labwise Software - EACH |
|||
| BAT3820 | Scientific Laboratory Supplies | EACH | 155.25 EUR |
LAB 149202F |
|||
| T32515-10mg | TargetMol Chemicals | 10mg | Ask for price |
LAB 149202F |
|||
| T32515-1g | TargetMol Chemicals | 1g | Ask for price |
LAB 149202F |
|||
| T32515-1mg | TargetMol Chemicals | 1mg | Ask for price |
LAB 149202F |
|||
| T32515-50mg | TargetMol Chemicals | 50mg | Ask for price |
LAB 149202F |
|||
| T32515-5mg | TargetMol Chemicals | 5mg | Ask for price |
Lab 170250F |
|||
| T25591-10mg | TargetMol Chemicals | 10mg | Ask for price |
Lab 170250F |
|||
| T25591-1g | TargetMol Chemicals | 1g | Ask for price |
Lab 170250F |
|||
| T25591-1mg | TargetMol Chemicals | 1mg | Ask for price |
Lab 170250F |
|||
| T25591-50mg | TargetMol Chemicals | 50mg | Ask for price |
Lab 170250F |
|||
| T25591-5mg | TargetMol Chemicals | 5mg | Ask for price |
LAB 149202F |
|||
| MBS5782083-5mg | MyBiosource | 5(mg | 915 EUR |
